Start your revenue cycle strong by ensuring that critical, and accurate, patient information is in place before patient visits begin.
Health Information Management
Our team of coding experts, with a deep understanding of the healthcare industry and its specialties, paired with smart technology creates a tangible, positive impact on cash flow.
Extended Business Office
AGS Health provides a comprehensive suite of RCM services that are customized for each customer. Our experienced team of experts serves as an extension of your business office.
Analytics and Reporting
Obtain answers to critical questions related to performance benchmarking, root cause analysis, predictive analytics, and operational improvements.
Connect with us
Request a demo
Latest CASE STUDIES
By Leigh Poland
April 5, 2022
As an independent agency that has provided objective oversight of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) since 1976, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) leads efforts to combat waste, fraud, and abuse. Among the federal government's civilian agencies, HHS is the largest. As of fiscal year 2022, the OIG has requested a budget of $428.9 million and operates with more than 1,600 employees. The OIG conducts nationwide investigations, inspections, and audits that may result in criminal convictions, civil penalties and settlements, and administrative sanctions against fraudsters.
Over the last several months, OIG has released three investigative reports that are requiring ACOs to refund millions of dollars in payments due to diagnosis codes not being assigned correctly. This is a significant and alarming trend. The major issue with all three investigations boils down to coding from a problem list.
Healthcare providers must be careful about coding directly from the problem list of a chart. The problem list can be documented as “Patient Active Problem List,” which suggests a list of only those conditions in the patient record that affect the patient’s care. However, the problem list has commonly become a list of all diagnoses assigned to the patient whether they are current, chronic, or even affect the patient’s care at all. Coders should not arbitrarily assign codes to these conditions, and clinicians need to manage the list to ensure that it’s complete, current, and accurate. Until this happens, it is essential for coders to continue reviewing the patient record to ensure that diagnoses documented in the problem list meet reporting criteria. This is not just an issue for ACOs either, it is a frequent issue for coders across all coded accounts and specialties.
Ensuring your compliance audit program is active, effective, and healthy is essential. A system for auditing must be implemented to measure the health of your compliance program.
Coding audits are a preventive measure that, regardless of your organization’s size, can safeguard your business. An advantage of conducting an external audit is that vendors can provide highly experienced auditors who bring an outside perspective, new ideas, and solutions to common pain points. When a provider hires an external auditor, the auditor will typically conduct a baseline audit that samples a variety of services to measure the coding compliance of each provider and coder. External audits are commonly performed on a quarterly, biannual, or annual bases depending on the strengths and weaknesses discovered during the baseline audit.
Leigh Poland RHIA, CCS
Leigh has over 20 years of coding experience and has worked in the coding and education realm over the last 20 years. Her true passion is coding education making sure coders are equipped to do their job accurately and with excellence. Academically, Leigh has graduated from Louisiana Tech University with a Bachelor of Science. Leigh has had the opportunity to present many times in the past at the AHIMA, ACDIS, and AAPC National Conventions. She has been a guest speaker on AHIMA webinars and has written several articles that were published in the AHIMA Journal. Leigh has traveled the US and internationally providing coding education.