An effective revenue cycle management (RCM) operating model aligns governance, workflows, workforce, and technology around the financial and operational outcomes a healthcare organization needs to achieve.
That context matters as healthcare leaders today are understandably more cautious about claims regarding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Early messaging often implied that deploying AI in RCM would make denials disappear, multiply productivity, or transform performance almost automatically. Experience has shown that technology alone can only do so much. Its value depends on how effectively it works with people and processes.
That caution does not diminish AI’s expected impact. In an HFMA survey of 145 healthcare finance professionals, 83.8% said AI and automation will fundamentally reshape hospitals over the next decade, while 45% identified revenue cycle accuracy and efficiency as a leading area where AI will deliver value.
The strategic question is how to convert that potential into sustained performance.
Start with RCM Outcomes
The strongest technology investments begin with the outcome the healthcare organization is trying to achieve.
A demonstration can show that AI can summarize information, generate text, automate an activity, or complete a transaction. Those capabilities matter when they translate into meaningful improvements in revenue cycle performance.
Before expanding an AI investment, leaders need clarity on what should improve, how improvement will be measured, what it will cost to achieve, who owns the result, and whether the evidence supports continued investment.
That outcome-based RCM approach is especially important because AI is not necessarily inexpensive. The economics extend beyond the technology itself. Integrating AI into an existing operation can require changes to workflows, human review, quality controls, and ongoing oversight.
The relevant question is therefore not simply whether AI can perform a task. It is whether using AI improves the overall result at an appropriate cost.
Combine AI with Revenue Cycle Expertise
AI also changes how leaders should think about workforce capacity. Technology can process information and perform routine work quickly. People bring clinical, medical coding, payer, operational, and financial expertise that technology cannot simply replace. The opportunity comes from combining the two.
In medical coding, for example, autonomous coding can fully handle routine, straightforward encounters, while AI assistance helps medical coders reach decisions on the remaining work more efficiently. That allows experienced professionals to concentrate on the reasoning and more complex decisions that require their expertise.
The same principle applies elsewhere in the revenue cycle. Technology can gather information, recognize patterns, automate repeatable activities, and prepare work for review. People can focus their time on the decisions, exceptions, and interactions where expertise creates the greatest value.
The objective is not to replace people with AI. It is determining how technology and human talent can work together more effectively.
Connect AI to the RCM Operating Model
The same outcome-based thinking should extend to the broader technology environment.
Healthcare organizations already operate numerous applications across patient access, medical coding, clinical documentation integrity, claims, denials, accounts receivable, and other revenue cycle functions. Continually adding isolated capabilities can make the environment harder to manage without necessarily improving the full revenue cycle.
Leaders should instead consider how existing and new capabilities work together.
That means looking at the workflow around the technology, the people who use or oversee it, the data required to support it, and the outcome it is expected to improve. It also means preserving technology investments that continue to create value rather than assuming innovation requires replacing what already works.
Every healthcare organization starts from a different position. Its technology environment, workflows, workforce strengths, priorities, and opportunities will shape the right combination of human expertise, automation, and AI.
Measure AI by the Impact on RCM Performance
AI is powerful, but it is still simply a tool. The next phase of AI adoption will be less about how much AI a healthcare organization uses and more about what that technology enables the organization to accomplish.
That requires continually tuning the combination of technology and human expertise as needs change, while measuring whether the model is producing the intended financial and operational results.
AGS Health InnovationWorks™ applies this discipline to practical revenue cycle challenges by starting with provider outcomes and developing governed innovations around the work that matters. Contact us to explore how to orchestrate AI, expertise, workflows, and governance to align with your revenue cycle priorities.
Frequently asked questions
Maxim Abramsky
Author
Chief Product Officer, AGS Health
Maxim Abramsky is Chief Product Officer at AGS Health, where he sets product strategy for AGS Health InnovationWorks™ and the company’s technology portfolio. His focus is turning AI and automation into measurable revenue cycle results for providers: fewer preventable denials, faster, more accurate reimbursement, lower cost to collect, and less administrative work for clinicians and revenue cycle teams.
Maxim has more than 20 years of healthcare technology leadership across payer, provider, and government markets. He has built and led global product organizations, scaled enterprise portfolios, and turned service-led businesses into recurring software revenue. His domain expertise covers prior authorization and utilization management, coding and risk adjustment, and payer-provider data exchange.
Before AGS Health, Maxim was Vice President of Product Management at a healthcare technology company. There he turned legacy services into a recurring software business and defined the company’s enterprise AI strategy. Earlier senior product roles covered clinical decision support, utilization management, risk adjustment, and interoperability. That payer-side background shapes how he builds provider products: they are designed to anticipate payer requirements and stop denials before a claim is submitted.